Becca (elearning development) and Elisabeth (numeracy accademic literacy)on BMW.
Iain spoke
Vickel spoke
What it might look like Living curriculium in action.
Ownership to the students. Activily involve students in the design.
Identify key topics breaking down aska few ? What do I want my students to know? Guide students through the process. Todays topic is... overview.... concepts..... depending on the level is how you/we approach learning demand...
Email me the doc vickel
enquiry: how learners go about asking and answering ?
discipline:
autonomy:
conversation:
What if...
What do I want my S to do? They construct their own meanings.
Web 2.0 tools encourages conversation this broadens the boundary
Constructivisium
Social C goes furture this fits the LC me and the group.
Youtube info using this. teacher models what is appropriate.
all programmes need to have LC in some way.
We need something to drive this... E learning strategy can do this...
Focus is now on the learner...
Finding info.
Course design is critical...
Assessment is important...
COP talk about practices willing to share growing the boundaries....
LC
If I only had time
Web 2.0 v's Moddle
COP on numeracy and communication (NICK).
GDHE Meloney Becca interfaces 1:1 we could then research this. 1 year long. Almost called the LC. Easy of hard? COP or by e learning.
Conclusion:
So all in all I'm of the belief that this meeting has been a great waste of time......
Run well by the two new girls, but sadly let down by an orchistrated disengagement of a majority of dumb staff. I mensioned dumb several times in the meeting.. how dumb are we? So we allow ourselves to be servant to the same old structure that keeps us well in control.
No comments:
Post a Comment